"While profit remains the final goal, entrepreneurs spend the better part of each day figuring out how better to serve the needs of their actual and potential customers. They are operationally, if not intentionally, altruistic."
Dinesh D'Souza
Interesting that D'Souza would combine economics with zoology.
Altruism is basically a zoological term!
According to my Oxford dictionary, altruism means "behavior of an animal that benefits another at its own expense."
How is that possible? I thought entrepreneurs were about their OWN BENEFIT!? They reap all the profits, right?
But according to D'Souza the final profit is the end goal! Where is the damage before that happens?
By definition, entrepreneurs are risk
takers. They are self driven and self confident. Go ahead, try to talk
them out of what they are doing. They are risking their reputations,
for sure, but also suffer in terms of family, finances and livelihood.
When they are putting together their crank
idea, let's say an image-dissecting camera tube that can transmit an
image (television), an entrepreneur's true source of strength is an
inner source. These are driven people. In terms of the television,
only about three people thought it could be done, and they competed!
They did have interaction with each other, but finally Philo T.
Farnsworth had his patent accepted and his company put out the Philco
television.
You should know that in a nearly secret,
basement lab (which he called "the cave") Farnsworth also invented a
defense early-warning system, submarine detection devices, radar
calibration equipment, and an infrared telescope. One of his most
significant developments was a circular-sweep radar display used in
controlling air traffic. He was essentially the father of today's
air-traffic control systems.
Unable to get financing for his ideas, he
cashed in all his family's personal wealth to keep things afloat. Not
succeeding the end of his life was a tailspin of personal disaster and
in his emotionally and physically-weak state contracted and died of
pneumonia. He was only 64.
In this case, profit was not the end
result, but the benefits to other animals were great. This story is one
of an altruist. And a true entrepreneur.
Now that I think of it, Jobs was only 56
when he died. While he did reap profits, his personal suffering, in
many ways, was a big part of that story.
No comments:
Post a Comment